[1962]DLHC1481February 2, 1962High Court

KROYE-ADUJAMA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs. HIAWU BESEASE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

The plaintiff co-operative society claimed entitlement to recover 110 bags of cocoa allegedly despatched in April 1961 to the Kumasi Co-operative Society and later stolen. The plaintiff alleged that the stolen cocoa was surreptitiously sold to the defendant co-operative society under circumstances that should have put the defendant on inquiry. The defendant denied purchasing the cocoa. The immediate issue before the court, however, was not the merits of title but whether, both parties being registered societies under the Co-operative Societies Ordinance, the dispute was one 'touching the business' of registered societies and therefore had to be referred to the Registrar rather than determined by the High Court. Portion of judgment: “The action in this case relates to 110 bags of cocoa which the plaintiff society claims it is entitled to recover from the defendant society… The plaintiff society claims that its cocoa having been stolen, was surreptitiously sold to the defendant society… The defendant society for its part denies that it bought any such cocoa as is alleged.”

read more

JUDGMENT OF APALOO J. The action in this case relates to 110 bags of cocoa which the plaintiff society claims it is entitled to recover from the defendant society. The plaintiff society’s case, so far as it is possible to state it from its pleadings, is that in April 1961, it despatched the said quantity of cocoa to the Kumasi Co-operative Society. It is said it was stolen but the pleadings are imprecise as to whether the theft took place while the cocoa was in transit or after it had been delivered to the recipient society. This point is however immaterial to the question which at present calls for determination. The plaintiff society claims that its cocoa having been stolen, was surreptitiously sold to the defendant society at a time and under circumstances which should have put it on enquiry. The defendant society for its part denies that it bought any such cocoa as is alleged. If the plaintiff society substantiates its case, the legal position is that the title to the cocoa re.....