[2014]DLSC2935March 12, 2014Supreme Court

EBUSUAPANYIN KWEKU ASSAFUAH, ANTHONY APPIAH AND REV. JOHN ADJEI vs. THE REGIONAL SECRETARY LAND COMMISSION SECRETARIAT AND REV. ARHIN DAVIES

The plaintiffs, led by the head of the Ebiradze family of Anaji and representatives of a residents’ association, sued the Regional Secretary of the Lands Commission Secretariat and Rev. Arhin Davies in the High Court, Sekondi, seeking injunctive and consequential reliefs to prevent deletion of leases over sectors B, C, D and F of the West Anaji Planning Scheme, to challenge the source and plotting of a plan submitted by the 2nd defendant, and to recover damages for alleged harassment and threats. Their case was that in earlier litigation their predecessor had sued over part of the land but the 2nd defendant had neither counterclaimed nor properly disclosed boundaries or title documents, and therefore could not rely on the earlier proceedings to support plotting and registration. The 2nd defendant contended that the plaintiffs’ predecessor, Ebusuapanyin Yaa Kwesi, had already litigated title to the same land against him in Suit No. LS 25/92 and had lost in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, and that the plaintiffs were therefore estopped from reopening the matter. Portion of judgment pointing to this: the section headed “FACTS OF THE CASE,” especially the reliefs set out after “On the 1st February 2007, the Plaintiffs herein instituted Suit No E1/16/07...” and the reproduced pleadings in paragraphs 1–6 and 14 of the statement of claim, together with paragraphs 5–11 of the amended defence and counterclaim.

read more

JONES DOTSE JSC: This appeal is an epitome of a phenomenon that is gradually creeping into the judicial and legal systems, and this is the difficulty of losing parties in previous litigations accepting the outcome of the decisions in those cases thereby respecting the age old principle that litigation must come to an end with the final resolution of previous and similar disputes albeit at the final apex court, in this instant the Supreme Court of Ghana. The Plaintiffs/Appellants/Appellants, hereafter referred to as the Plaintiffs lodged an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 1st December, 2011 which confirmed an earlier decision of the High Court, Sekondi which was rendered on 15th June, 2010 in favour of the 2nd Defendant/Respondent/Respondent hereafter referred to as the Defendant. FACTS OF THE CASE On the 1st February 2007, the Plaintiffs herein instituted Suit No E1/16/07 in the High Court, Sekondi against the Defendants in which they claimed for themse...